The future of ice sheets & sea ice could be quite dramatic
The ice-albedo feedback is notorious
positive feedback loop (think back to my ‘Back to Basics’ entry about feedback
loops). I’m sure you’re all somewhat familiar with the concepts involved here
given frequent mass media coverage. If a certain ice cover is decreasing in
size, the albedo (i.e., reflectivity) of the formerly ice-covered region
usually decreases. Think about how much hotter black painted surfaces are than
white in mid-summer. Hence, more sunlight can be absorbed, the additional
heating of which gives rise to further shrinkage. Once these ice masses have
shrunk below an anticipated critical extent the ice-albedo feedback might lead
to the irreversible and unstoppable loss of the remaining ice. This differing
levels of albedo and extent to which they apply are ultimately linked to global
average temperatures, with a positive correlation existing between reduced ice
extent and increased temperatures.
The existence of this tipping point is a
widely held scientific consensus. However, if we were heading into a period of
glaciation and not warming (an interglacial) then the opposite would of course
apply as the ice extent spread further, promoting a cooling global temperature.
Dirk Notz and Joachim Schellnhuber, in an article (2009) entitled ‘The future of ice sheets and sea ice:
Between reversible retreat and unstoppable loss’, debates (accepting the
probable existence of the above tipping point) using conceptual arguments
whether Artic sea ice, in a cooler climate, could recover rapidly from the loss
it has experienced in recent years. The alternative being that it could not and
would thus surpass the critical ice extent threshold. The author calculates
this through the use of a ‘simple’ energy-balance model.
You can check it out here if you’re at UCL (if not use the full reference
at the bottom): http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/pdfplus/40536041.pdf?acceptTC=true&acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
The fundamental issue contained is whether
the existence of the ice-albedo feedback does or does not necessarily lead to
instability of the Earth's ice masses (a requirement for the positive feedback
loop to take hold).
In addition a key distinction exists
between seas ice and ice sheets, as well as the location of the ice concerned
as Notz compares Arctic summer sea ice to the Greenland ice sheet and the West
Antarctic ice sheet.
Ditz and Schellnhuber say that sea ice is probably capable of recovering rapidly once the
climate turns cold again as there are some other feedbacks (which counter the
albedo one discussed) which act to stabilise the ice, revealed in a
more-complex study (Eisenman and Wettlauf, 2009). Thus any measures taken to slow down climate
warming can immediately slow down future sea-ice loss. Good News! For Arctic
sea ice, he explains why the recently observed rapid decrease in ice extent,
which the papers have focused on largely because of the polar bears, might just
be a consequence of a smooth and slow shift in ice-thickness distribution.
However if no measures were taken to combat or at least mitigate global warming
then a transition to a seasonal ice-free Arctic ocean seems unavoidable, with
possibly far-reaching consequences for the indigenous population, the Arctic
ecosystem, and the climate system as a whole. Less good!
Where ice sheets are concerned there are no
feedbacks to counter the albedo effect thus a tipping point is actually more
likely, so meaning the melting would be unstoppable past a certain degree of
warming, coming sooner than is the case with sea ice.
So there we have it, certainly not as
straight forward as the media would have you believe (as always?), also
interestingly in a sense ought not to be overly relevant to policy makers
discussed previously in my blog posts, given the global nature of the forcings
and impacts. However it’s all certainly relevant & I guess that means Captain Marvel and Superman are still going at it....
Unless you were to believe Lindsay and Zhang (2005) instead who state that we defiantly have a already passed the tipping point, Captain Marvel?
Unless you were to believe Lindsay and Zhang (2005) instead who state that we defiantly have a already passed the tipping point, Captain Marvel?
Eisenman, I. Wettlaufer, J.S. (2009) Nonlinear threshold behaviour during the loss of Arctic sea ice. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 106:28-32.
Lindsay, R. W., J. Zhang, 2005: The Thinning of Arctic Sea Ice, 1988–2003: Have We Passed a Tipping Point?. J. Climate, 18, 4879–4894.
Notz, D. and Schellnhuber, H.J. (2009) The Future of Ice Sheets and Sea Ice:
Between Reversible Retreat and Unstoppable Loss. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America , Vol. 106, No. 49, pp.
20590-20595
No comments:
Post a Comment